a key criticism of rational and categorical thinking:
The problem isn’t [just] the categories per se, it’s how we use them in rationalism! It’s categorical logic – how we deduce from categorical statements/judgements/propositions.
maybe in general the problem can be formulated like so:
Due to the fractal structure of nature, [and especially of the dialectical interface between our minds/thoughts/concepts/words and experience/nature,]
no statement of the form is ever correct! (assuming S and R refer to concepts/general names/categories from science/language, & thus are not simply trivially-artificially defined sub-sets of eachother…)
- ( I should try later to write why exactly this is the case – how the fractal structure of nature is incompatible with categorical deduction. )